Wilson v. Hays et al

Wilson v. Hays et al

Plaintiff:	Melanie Wilson
Defendant:	Christopher R. Hays and San Diego, City of
Case Number:	3:2016cv01161
Filed:	May 13, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	David H. Bartick
Presiding Judge:	Cynthia Bashant
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 19, 2017	Filing 30 ORDER granting Defendant Christopher R. Hays' 21 Motion to Dismiss. Court dismisses Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint against Hays with leave to amend. If Plaintiff chooses to file a Second Amended Complaint, it must be filed by 5/3/2017. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 4/19/2017. (jah)
January 13, 2017	Filing 18 ORDER granting in part and denying in part the City's 4 Motion to Dismiss. Specifically, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's first claim against the City without leave to amend but denies the City's request to dismiss Plaintiff's second claim. The Court grants Hay's 14 Motion to Dismiss. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's first claim against Hays with leave to amend and dismisses Plaintiff's second claim against Hays without leave to amend. If Plaintiff chooses to file a First Amended Complaint, she must do so no later than January 27, 2017. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 1/13/17. (kas)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 19, 2017

Filing 30 ORDER granting Defendant Christopher R. Hays' 21 Motion to Dismiss. Court dismisses Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint against Hays with leave to amend. If Plaintiff chooses to file a Second Amended Complaint, it must be filed by 5/3/2017. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 4/19/2017. (jah)

January 13, 2017

Filing 18 ORDER granting in part and denying in part the City's 4 Motion to Dismiss. Specifically, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's first claim against the City without leave to amend but denies the City's request to dismiss Plaintiff's second claim. The Court grants Hay's 14 Motion to Dismiss. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's first claim against Hays with leave to amend and dismisses Plaintiff's second claim against Hays without leave to amend. If Plaintiff chooses to file a First Amended Complaint, she must do so no later than January 27, 2017. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 1/13/17. (kas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. Hays et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melanie Wilson
Represented By:	James C Mitchell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher R. Hays
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: San Diego, City of
Represented By:	Keith W Phillips
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?