Dew v. Hatton et al
| David L. Dew |
| Shawn Hatton and Scott Kernan |
| 3:2016cv01985 |
| August 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Monterey |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER DISMISSING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction. In light of the Ninth Circuit's order, the Court dismisses the second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) without prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/4/2019.(rmc)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER DISMISSING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction. In light of the Ninth Circuit's order, the Court dismisses the second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) without prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/4/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER: Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge; Granting Respondents' 7 Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/21/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
