Diaz v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 28, 2017
ORDER (1) Adopting 63 Report and Recommendation (2) Granting 52 Motion to Dismiss. This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R, adopts the R&R in its entirety. Defendant Sedighi's motion to dismiss is granted. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 12/28/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|September 12, 2017
ORDER (1) Adopting Report and Recommendation, (2) Denying Motion to Dismiss, (3) Granting In Part and Denying In Part Motion to Amend and (4) Denying Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R, ad opts the R&R in its entirety. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is granted as to Defendant Newton and denied as to Defendant Laxamanna. Defendant Sidighi's motion to dismiss is denied, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is also denied. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/12/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|August 10, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. (ECF Nos. 21 , 25 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 43 ) The Court RECOMMENDS (1) Dr. Sidighi's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25) be DENIED, (2) Plaintiff 39;s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 21) be GRANTED as to Dr. Newton and DENIED as to Officer Laxamanna, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 41 at 33-36) be DENIED. Any party to this action may file writte n objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties no later than August 30, 2017. Any Reply to the Objections shall be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than September 6, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 8/10/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|June 5, 2017
ORDER: (1) granting 36 Request for Extension of time re 21 MOTION to Amend ( Reply due by 6/19/2017); (2) denying 38 Request for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 6/5/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (fth) Modified text on 6/5/2017 (jao).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?