Aguon v. Montgomery et al
Petitioner: Michael J. Aguon
Respondent: Warren L. Montgomery and Kamala D. Harris
Case Number: 3:2016cv02421
Filed: September 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Imperial
Presiding Judge: Jan M. Adler
Presiding Judge: Dana M. Sabraw
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Petitioner's arguments are without merit. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 11/20/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
August 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: (1) Adopting 13 Report and Recommendation; (2) Granting 12 Motion to Stay; and (2) Denying Respondent's 10 Motion to Dismiss. This action is stayed until the California Supreme Court rules on Petitioner's pending state habeas petition Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 8/28/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
June 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION on the Warden's 10 Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition and Petitioner Aguon's Request for a Stay. This Court RECOMMENDS that: 1) Aguon's request for a stay (ECF No. 12) be GRANTED, and that the case be stayed until the California Supreme Court rules on his pending state habeas petition; 2) Aguon be required to file a status report about his state habeas petition every two months, starting on the first day of the month after the District Judge's rulin g in this matter, and to file a final status report within seven days of any ruling on his state habeas petition; and 3) respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) be DENIED. Upon being served with a copy of this report, the parties have 14 day s to file any objections. Upon being served with any objections, the party receiving such objections has 14 days to file any response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 6/12/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aguon v. Montgomery et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael J. Aguon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warren L. Montgomery
Represented By: Vincent Paul LaPietra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kamala D. Harris
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?