Admiral Insurance Company v. Urban Housing Partners, Inc et al
| Admiral Insurance Company |
| Urban Housing Partners, Inc, Sherman D. Harmer, 1907 Columbia, LLC and Does 1 through 20 |
| 3:2016cv02720 |
| November 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 22 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 27 Ex Parte Motion for Order Shortening Time. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motion to stay and DENIES AS MOOT their ex parte motion for an order shortening time. (Doc. Nos. 22, 27.) This cas e is STAYED until the Underlying Action is resolved. Urban Housing Partners, Inc. and Sherman D. Harmer are ORDERED to provide the Court with a status report, apprising the Court of the Underlying Action's status, sixty days following this order's issuance and every sixty days thereafter until the Underlying Action is resolved. Failure to provide these reports in a timely manner will result in lifting the stay. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 5/5/2017. (acc)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying 4 Motion for More Definite Statement. Accordingly, the hearing date currently set for 3/2/2017, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 3B is hereby VACATED. The Court DENIES 1907 Columbia's motion. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 12/28/2016. (acc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
