Greenbroz, Inc. v. Laeger Built, LLC et al
| Greenbroz, Inc. |
| Laeger Built, LLC, Jeffery Laeger and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2016cv02946 |
| December 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The parties' Joint Motion for Entry of an Agreed Judgment is Hereby Granted. The case has been settled in accordance with the terms of the Agreed Judgment. Further, as set forth in the settlement all claims and counterclaims not disposed of in the Agreed Judgment are dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court shall Close the case. It is So Ordered. (jjg)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim and Motion to Strike Affirmative Defense [Doc. No. 19 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/22/2017. (jjg)
|
|
Filing
15
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Defendants Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 11] is Denied with respect to personal jurisdiction; Jeffery Laegers Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim [Doc. No. 11] is Granted; Defendants Motion to For a More Definite Statement [Doc. No. 11] is Denied as moot; and, Plaintiffs request for Jurisdictional Discovery [Doc. No. 13] is Denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jjg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
