Oliver v. Beceraa

Oliver v. Beceraa

Plaintiff:	Christopher Oliver
Defendant:	Lanae Beceraa
Case Number:	3:2016cv03016
Filed:	December 9, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Bernardino
Presiding Judge:	Larry Alan Burns
Presiding Judge:	Peter C. Lewis
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 4, 2017	Filing 8 ORDER Sua Sponte Dismissing First Amended Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court dismisses Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for failing to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be g ranted. Because the Court finds further amendment futile, leave to amend is denied. The Court further certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order of dismissal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/3/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf)
March 9, 2017	Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court dismisses plaintiff's complaint for failing to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court grants plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/9/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 4, 2017

Filing 8 ORDER Sua Sponte Dismissing First Amended Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court dismisses Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for failing to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be g ranted. Because the Court finds further amendment futile, leave to amend is denied. The Court further certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order of dismissal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/3/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf)

March 9, 2017

Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court dismisses plaintiff's complaint for failing to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court grants plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/9/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oliver v. Beceraa
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Oliver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lanae Beceraa
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?