Locke v. Paramo
| Marvin K. Locke |
| Daniel Paramo |
| 3:2017cv00453 |
| March 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER Denying 21 Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/26/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
19
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, Overrules Petitioner's Objections, and deniesPetitioner's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/8/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Marvin K. Locke. It is ordered that no later than 8/23/2017, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. It is further ordered that any reply to the objections shall be served and filed not later than8/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 8/4/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: (1) Denying as Moot 2 Motion to File a Second or Successive Petition; And (2) Requiring Response to Petition. It is ordered that Respondent must file a Notice of Appearance no later than 3/27/2017. Respondent must file a motion to dism iss pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases no later than 5/15/2017. If Respondent files a motion to dismiss, Petitioner must file his opposition, if any, to the motion no later than 6/15/2017. If Respondent does not contend that the Petition can be decided without the Court reaching the merits of Petitioners claims, Respondent must file and serve an answer to the Petition no later than 5/15/2017. Petitioner may file a traverse to matters raised in the answer no later than 6/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 3/8/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Attorney General served via CM/ECF)(dxj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Locke v. Paramo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marvin K. Locke | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Daniel Paramo | |
| Represented By: | David Delgado-Rucci |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
