Cogswell v. Superior Court of San Diego County et al
| Henry Ivan Cogswell |
| Superior Court of San Diego County, K. Michael Kirkman, Christine Trevino, Oliver P. Cleary and Patricia A. Scott |
| 3:2017cv00480 |
| March 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER Dismissing First Amended Complaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/19/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag) (sjt).
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. IT IS ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim and for seeking monetary damages against immune defendants. However, Plaintif f is granted forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is Filed in which to file a First Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies. (2) The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a form civil rights complaint to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 5/4/2017.Form civil rights complaint mailed to Plaintiff. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
