Gerber v. FCA US LLC et al
| Michael Gerber |
| FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2017cv00518 |
| March 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part: (1) Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees, Costs, and Expenses, (Doc. No. 80 ); and (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Re-Tax Costs, (Doc. No. 95 ). Plaintiffs motion for attorneys' fees is granted in part an d denied in part in the modified amount of $30,430.82; and Plaintiff's motion to re-tax costs is granted in part and denied in part in the modified amount of $10,000.00. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 10/26/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 9 , 10 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Gerber's motion to remand is DENIED. (Doc. Nos. 9, 10.) Because the Court denies his motion, Gerber's request for attorneys fees and costs is also DENIED. (Doc. No. 9-1 at 13.) The parties' requests for jurisdictional discovery are DENIED. (Id. at 12; Doc. No. 15 at 1617). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 6/23/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
