Nasser et al v. Julius Samann LTD et al
Ibrahim Nasser and Serious Scents |
Julius Samann LTD, Nature's Appeal Manufacturing Corporation and Energizer Brands II, LLC |
3:2017cv00863 |
April 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Mitchell D. Dembin |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 135 ORDER DISMISSING SERIOUS SCENTS AS A NAMED PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 6/18/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjm) |
Filing 96 ORDER Granting 58 and 59 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Granting 60 Motion to Quash; Denying 81 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel; Granting 83 and 87 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend. Plaintiffs have 30 days from the entry of this order to file the Fourth Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/25/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Filing 28 ORDER Granting 11 Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim; Denying 6 Motion for More Definite Statement; Denying 9 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to First-To-File Rule without Prejudice. Plaintiffs may file and serve a First Amended Complaint on or before 9/8/2017. If Plaintiffs fail to do so, the Court will close this case. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/14/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mxn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.