Ameranth Inc. v. Splick-It, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ameranth Inc.
Defendant: Splick-It, Inc. and Does 1 through 20
Cross_claimant: Splick-It, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Ameranth, Inc. and Roes 1 through 20
Case Number: 3:2017cv01093
Filed: May 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: William V. Gallo
Presiding Judge: Dana M. Sabraw
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Granting 39 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Dean Theodore Janis terminated. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.3(j), Splick-It, Inc. shall file a notice of appearance of new counsel on or before January 15, 2021. If Splick-It, Inc. does not identify its new counsel on or before January 15, 2021, the Court will hold an Order to Show Cause hearing on January 22, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. as to why sanctions, including dismissal of the Cross-Complaint as to Splick-It, Inc., should not be imposed for its failure to comply with Local Civil Rule 83.3(j). For all future matters in this case, the address of record for Splick-It, Inc. is as follows: 1881 9th Street, Suite 303, Boulder, CO 80302. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 12/31/2020. (mme)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ameranth Inc. v. Splick-It, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ameranth Inc.
Represented By: William J. Caldarelli
Represented By: Jack Reynolds Leer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Splick-It, Inc.
Represented By: Dean Theodore Janis
Represented By: Arthur P. Licygiewicz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_claimant: Splick-It, Inc.
Represented By: Dean Theodore Janis
Represented By: Arthur P. Licygiewicz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: Ameranth, Inc.
Represented By: William J. Caldarelli
Represented By: Jack Reynolds Leer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: Roes 1 through 20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?