Shteynberg v. San Diego County Jail Sheriff's Department Medical Team
| Rudolf Shteynberg |
| San Diego County Jail Sheriff's Department Medical Team |
| 3:2017cv01098 |
| May 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER Denying Pending Motions (ECF Nos. 72 , 74 , 76 ). the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 72 ) and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Request a Hearing on Damages (ECF No. 74 ). To the extent Plaintiff's Notic e to the Ethical Committee of the Judicial Performances Recusal of District Judge (ECF No. 76 ) requests the undersigned recuse herself and requests appointment of counsel, the Court DENIES those requests. This case remains closed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/25/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/20/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER: (1) Dismissing Without Prejudice Plaintiff's 57 First Amended Complaint; (2) Denying 55 Motion for Electronic Notice; and (3) Denying 64 , 66 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/12/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Denying 45 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 47 Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/2/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Denying 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court Denies Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 23 ) and grants Plaintiff an additional thirty (30) days from the date on which this Order is electronically docketed to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/18/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER on Various Motions: 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; 10 Motion Stop Correspondence to Mailing Address; 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; 14 Motion to Expedite; 16 Motion to Expedite; denying 16 Request to Expedite, Appoint Counsel, Stop Mail and Transfer Case; denying 18 Motion for Recusal. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. But out of an abundance of fairness to Plaintiff, the Court grants Plaintiff an additional thirty (30) days from th e date on which this Order is electronically docketed to file an amended complaint. The Court, again, instructs Plaintiff to file an amended complaint that explains, among other things, who did what, when they it, and why Plaintiff believes t hose actions require legal relief. Failure to file an amended complaint within thirty days may result in this case being dismissed for failure to prosecute. It is ordered that the Court denies without prejudice Plaintiffs Motions to Appoint Counsel (ECF Nos. 8, 12, 16). Thus, the Court denies as moot Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite (ECF No. 14). Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion, (ECF No. 10). The Court denies with prejudice Plaintiffs Motion to Transfer Venue, (ECF No. 16). Finally, Plaintiff asks the undersigned to recuse from the case and "to appoint a Judge acting in the same ethnicity / or language which is Russian/ English...." (ECF No. 18.) Accordingly, the Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff's Motion for Recusal, (ECF No. 18). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/1/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date on which this Order is electronically dockete d. Should Plaintiff fail to file an amended complaint within the time provided, the Court may enter a final order dismissing this civil action with prejudice. The Court denies without Prejudice Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and denies as moot Plaintiff's 5 Motion to Expedite Legal Process. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/30/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (fth)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shteynberg v. San Diego County Jail Sheriff's Department Medical Team | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rudolf Shteynberg | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: San Diego County Jail Sheriff's Department Medical Team | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
