Gaines v. General Motors Company et al
| Kelley Gaines |
| General Motors Company and Does 1 through 25 |
| 3:2017cv01351 |
| July 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER Denying 27 Motion for Leave to Amend; and ORDER of Dismissal. Gaines' motion for leave to amend is denied. The SAC is therefore dismissed without leave to amend. Gaines' claims are dismissed with prejudice and the putative class's claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/17/2020. (jdt)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 22 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/25/2019. (jdt)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Leave to Amend (ECF No. 13 ). The motion for leave to amend is granted as to the request to substitute in General Motors LLC as the sole Defendant, and to add the California Consumer Legal Remedi es Act claim. Leave to add parties, claims by out-of-state parties, and claims arising under the laws of other states is denied. The unjust enrichment act already in the complaint can remain, but leave to amend it so that it applies to the other proposed parties is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/6/2018. (jdt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
