Simpson Performance Products, Inc. v. Mastercraft Safety, Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Simpson Performance Products, Inc. v. Mastercraft Safety, Inc. et al

Simpson Performance Products, Inc. v. Mastercraft Safety, Inc. et al

Plaintiff:	Simpson Performance Products, Inc.
Defendant:	Impact Racing Inc.
Case Number:	3:2017cv01706
Filed:	August 23, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Roger T. Benitez
Presiding Judge:	Mitchell D. Dembin
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 16, 2018	Filing 50 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. If Plaintiff elects to amend its pleading, it must file a Second Amended Complaint within ten (10) days of the date this Order is filed. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 5/16/2018. (anh)
August 23, 2017	Filing 30 ORDER adopting 19 Memorandum and Recommendations; denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss; Mastercraft Safety, Inc is terminated as a defendant in this action; granting 25 Motion to Dismiss to the extent that this Court concludes that venue is improper in this District. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the Southern District of California. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 8/22/2017. (tmg)[Transferred from North Carolina Western on 8/23/2017.]

Date Filed

Document Text

May 16, 2018

Filing 50 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. If Plaintiff elects to amend its pleading, it must file a Second Amended Complaint within ten (10) days of the date this Order is filed. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 5/16/2018. (anh)

August 23, 2017

Filing 30 ORDER adopting 19 Memorandum and Recommendations; denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss; Mastercraft Safety, Inc is terminated as a defendant in this action; granting 25 Motion to Dismiss to the extent that this Court concludes that venue is improper in this District. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the Southern District of California. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 8/22/2017. (tmg)[Transferred from North Carolina Western on 8/23/2017.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson Performance Products, Inc. v. Mastercraft Safety, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Simpson Performance Products, Inc.
Represented By:	Craig N. Killen
Represented By:	Karl Summey Sawyer, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Impact Racing Inc.
Represented By:	Adam Spencer Garson
Represented By:	Anup M. Shah
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?