Martin v. Berg et al
| Lance R. Martin |
| R. Berg and M. Rinni |
| 3:2017cv01750 |
| August 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 17 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Denying as Moot 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Production of Documents. The Court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss in its entirety. (Doc. No. 17.) The Court DISMISSES Martins case wi thout leave to amend. The Court also DENIES as moot Martin's motion for production as documents. (Doc. No. 21.) The Court Clerk is instructed to close the case. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 3/1/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER denying as moot 2 Plaintiff's IFP Motion and Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint without Prejudice. The Court:1) DENIES as moot Martin's IFP motion, (Doc. No. 2);2) DISMISSES without prejudice the § 1983 claim against all de fendants;3) DISMISSES without prejudice the First Amendment Retaliation claim against Rinni; and4) GRANTS Martin leave to amend his complaint by 10/26/2017. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 10/8/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
