Harrison v. Wheat
| David Scott Harrison |
| Michael G. Wheat and DOES 1-3 |
| 3:2017cv02404 |
| November 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Marin |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 7/3/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 13 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Because Harrison failed to state a claim under § 1983 and Bivens, the Court GRANTS Wheat's motion to dismiss with prejudice. (Doc. No. 13-1.) The Court finds any amendment would be fu tile, as Harrison cannot overcome Wheat's prosecutorial immunity. Thus, the Court ORDERS the Court Clerk to close the case. Because the Court is dismissing Harrisons complaint, the Court FINDS AS MOOT Harrison's motion for service, in forma pauperis status, and scheduling order. (Doc. No. 10.) Moreover, the Court DENIES his request for counsel and DENIES AS MOOT his other hearing requests. (Doc. No. 21.). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 3/1/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
