McCullock v. Brown et al
| Robert McCullock |
| Robert Brown, Fabrice Hadjadj, J. Davices and P. Covello |
| 3:2018cv00548 |
| March 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Gonzalo P. Curiel |
| Peter C. Lewis |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 85 ) is adopted in full. Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23 ) are overruled. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 58 ) is granted. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/2/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing
85
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Objections to R&R due by 2/14/2020 and Replies due by 2/21/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 1/28/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER Denying: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; and (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. (ECF Nos. 67 , 77 ) As discovery in this case closed on May 22, 2019, the Court will not entertain any further motions to compel filed by Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 10/8/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tcf)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 36 ) is adopted in its entirety and the Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses (ECF No. 27 ) is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/20/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER DENYING AS PREMATURE PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL re 38 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 4/3/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjm)
|
|
Filing
36
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for Order Denying Plaintiff's 27 MOTION to Strike. Objections to R&R due by 3/29/2019 and Replies due by 4/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 3/1/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motions for Permissive Joinder (ECF No. 15) in Cejas v. Brown, 18-cv-543-WQH-JLB; (ECF No. 17 ) in McCullock v. Brown, 18-cv-548-WQH-JLB; (ECF No. 7) in Austin v. Brown, 18-cv-600-WQH-JLB; (ECF No. 8 ) in Harmon v. Brown, 18-cv-1030-WQH-JLB are Denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/29/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER: The Court: Grants McCullock's Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 5 ). Directs the Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b )(2). Directs the Clerk to issue a summons as to FAC and IFP package. Orders U.S. Marshal to effect service. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 07/12/2018. (Order served to Secretary of CDCR electronically and via U.S. Mail Service) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (ajs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
