Schmidt v. Mize et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 3, 2018
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Court dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Sheoboni and Woods. Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Liberty Healthcare and Sheriff's Depart ment Deputies 1-10. Court certifies that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant rom28 USC 1915(a)(3). Court directs the Clerk to enter final of judgment of dismissal and to close the file. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 10/3/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|May 29, 2018
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b) (2). Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for seeking damages from a defendant who is immune pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1),(2). Court grants Plaintiff fort y-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 5/29/2018. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?