Omni Medsci, Inc. v. Dexcom, Inc.
Omni Medsci, Inc. |
Dexcom, Inc. |
3:2018cv01653 |
July 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
William V Gallo |
John A Houston |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 0271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER granting Joint Motion to Continue Hearing Date for Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 9/14/2018. (anh) |
Filing 22 Joint MOTION to Continue Hearing Date for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Omni Medsci, Inc.. (Halan, John)Attorney John M. Halan added to party Omni Medsci, Inc.(pty:pla) (anh). |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward H Sikorski on behalf of Dexcom, Inc. (Sikorski, Edward)Attorney Edward H Sikorski added to party Dexcom, Inc.(pty:dft) (anh). |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy H. Walters on behalf of Dexcom, Inc. (Walters, Amy)Attorney Amy H. Walters added to party Dexcom, Inc.(pty:dft) (anh). |
Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Dexcom, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration Richard Mulloy, #3 Exhibit A)(Mulloy, Richard) (anh). |
Filing 18 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of John M. Halan, re #17 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/13/2018.(dsn) |
Filing 17 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-11559311.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Halan, John) (dsn). |
Filing 16 ORDER granting in Part Joint Motion to Extend Time For Defendant to Respond to Complaint. [Doc. No. #14 ] (anh) |
Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dexcom, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Mulloy, Richard) (anh). |
Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,,,,, Joint Motion to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint by Dexcom, Inc.. (Mulloy, Richard)Attorney Richard Thomas Mulloy added to party Dexcom, Inc.(pty:dft) (anh). |
Filing 13 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Thomas A. Lewry, re #10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/8/2018. (mdc) |
Filing 12 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Robert C. J. Tuttle, re #9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/8/2018. (mdc) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Omni Medsci, Inc.. Dexcom, Inc. served. (Thomson, William) (anh). |
Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-11537198.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Lewry, Thomas) (mdc) |
Filing 9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-11537116.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Tuttle, Robert) (mdc) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 18cv1653 CAB (WVG).(no document attached) (jcj) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER. Judge William Q. Hayes has declined assignment pursuant to General Order 598. Case reassigned to Judge Roger T. Benitez for all further proceedings. The new case number is 18cv1653 BEN (WVG).(no document attached) (jcj) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER - Judge John A. Houston recuses from this matter and directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign the matter to a different Judge. Case reassigned to Judge William Q. Hayes for all further proceedings. The new case number is 18CV1653-WQH(WVG). (jpp) |
Filing 5 NOTICE (Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark) by Omni Medsci, Inc. (Thomson, William) (jpp). |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Omni Medsci, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Thomson, William) (jpp). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrm)(jrd) |
Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *9,770,174*, *10,004,402* (cc: USPTO)(jrm)(jrd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Dexcom, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11467540), filed by Omni Medsci, Inc. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet, #2 Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A-U.S. Patent No. 9,770,174 B2, #4 Exhibit B-U.S. Patent No. 10,004,402 B2, #5 Exhibit C1-Dexcom Article, #6 Exhibit C2-Dexcom G4 Platinum - Quick Start Guide, #7 Exhibit C3-Dexcom G4 Platinum - Users Guide, #8 Exhibit C4-Dexcom Presentation The Leader in Continuous Glucose Monitoring, #9 Exhibit C5-Dexcom Share User Manual, #10 Exhibit D1-Dexcom G5 Mobile Getting Started Guide, #11 Exhibit D2-Dexcom G5 Mobile User Guide 2018, #12 Exhibit D3-Dexcom G5 Mobile User Guide 2016, #13 Exhibit D4-Website - Dexcom Apps Diabetes CGM Mobile App Dexcom - www.dexcom/apps, #14 Exhibit D5-Website Dexcom G5 Mobile CGM System Continous Glucose Monitoring on your Smart Device-www.dexcom/g5-mobile-cgm, #15 Exhibit D6-Website Waltzing the Dragon www.walzingthedrago.ca, #16 Exhibit E1-Dexcom G6 Using Your G6, #17 Exhibit E2-Dexcom G6 Start Here Set Up, #18 Exhibit E3 Part 1-Dexcom G6 User Guide, #19 Exhibit E3 Part 2-Dexcom G6 User Guide)The new case number is 3:18-cv-01653-JAH-WVG. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Thomson, William)(jrm)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.