Loucks v. Barret Daffin Frappier Tredder & Weiss LLP et al
Elena A. Loucks |
Quality Loan Service Corp., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Barret Daffin Frappier Tredder & Weiss LLP |
3:2018cv01742 |
July 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
William Q Hayes |
Bernard G Skomal |
Nita L Stormes |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a)rp Fed. Question: Real Property |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal for all further proceedings. The new case number is 18-cv-1742-WQH-BGS. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Elena A. Loucks. (tcf) (jao). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elena A. Loucks. (tcf) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Barret Daffin Frappier Tredder & Weiss LLP, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Quality Loan Service Corp., IFP Filed, filed by Elena A. Loucks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1742-WQH-NLS. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case. (Loucks, Elena)(tcf) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.