Butcher v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Marjorie Lee Butcher
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Case Number: 3:2018cv01956
Filed: August 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jill L Burkhardt
Referring Judge: Marilyn L Huff
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter) (jah)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #5 Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to issue a summons as to Plaintiff's Complaint. Court orders the US Marshal to serve the complaint and summons upon Defendant. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 9/14/2018. (IFP Package prepared and mailed to Plaintiff's counsel via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
September 13, 2018 Filing 5 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marjorie Lee Butcher. (Bourgeois Haley, Denise) (Main Document 5 replaced on 9/14/2018). Modified on 9/14/2018 - Pdf attached in format that can be altered. Added flattened pdf to correct image (jah).
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Court grants Plaintiff 14 days from the date of this Order, absent further order of the Court, to either pay the full filing fee or file a new motion to proceed IFP. If Plaintiff files a new motion to proceed IFP, Court requests that Plaintiff use the Court-approved form and provide all requested information. If Plaintiff fails to pay the full filing fee or file a complete motion to proceed IFP within 14 days, Court reserves the right to dismiss the case without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1914(a). Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 8/30/2018. (Blank Motion for IFP form t/w copy of this Order mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
August 23, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marjorie Lee Butcher. (jrm)
August 23, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Marjorie Lee Butcher. No Additional Parties With Financial Interest Identified. (jrm)
August 23, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy Berryhill, IFP Filed, filed by Marjorie Lee Butcher. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-01956-H-JLB. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Bourgeois Haley, Denise)(jrm) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Butcher v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marjorie Lee Butcher
Represented By: Denise L Bourgeois Haley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?