Sabatini v. California Board of Registered Nursing et al
Petitioner: William Sabatini
Respondent: California Board of Registered Nursing and Does 1-50
Case Number: 3:2018cv02036
Filed: August 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Anthony J Battaglia
Referring Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2018 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against California Board of Registered Nursing, Does 1-50, filed by William Sabatini. (Riznyk, Steven) QC re: incorrect filing, must withdraw and re-file correct document (acc).
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Rejecting re #4 MOTION for Order , from Petitioner William Sabatini. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Proposed order prohibited on docket. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 9/6/2018.(acc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/6/2018: #1 Rejected Document) (acc).
September 5, 2018 Filing 4 ***STRICKEN PER ORDER #5 ***MOTION for Order by William Sabatini. (Riznyk, Steven) (acc). Modified on 9/6/2018 (acc). (Main Document 4 replaced on 9/6/2018) (acc).
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA: granting #2 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Plaintiff's brief is limited to 45 pages in length. (no document attached) (sc)
August 30, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by William Sabatini. (jrm)
August 30, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by William Sabatini. (sjt).
August 30, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus against California Board of Registered Nursing, Does 1-50 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11620556.), filed by William Sabatini. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet, #2 Statement of Facts Motion, #3 Request for Judicial Notice Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Proof of Service, #5 Memo of Points and Authorities Points and Authorities in support, #6 Exhibits A - C, #7 Exhibit D 1, #8 Exhibit D 2,, #9 Exhibits E - J)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02036-AJB-AGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Riznyk, Steven)(jrm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sabatini v. California Board of Registered Nursing et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Sabatini
Represented By: Steven Riznyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: California Board of Registered Nursing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Does 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?