Williams v. Department of Justice et al
| Lance Williams |
| Xavier Becerra and Department of Justice |
| 3:2018cv02095 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: (1) Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis as Barred by 28 USC 1915(g). [ECF No. #2 ]; and Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice for Failure to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 10/31/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) (sjt).
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Lance Williams. (jms) |
| Filing 4 Exhibits by Lance Williams. (jms) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Lance Williams. (jms) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lance Williams. (jms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Xavier Becerra, Department of Justice,, filed by Lance Williams. ($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 CDCR Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2095-CAB-MDD. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
