Rodriguez v. Chelsea Investment Southern California Housing Collaborative et al
| Michael Rodriguez |
| Emerson Construction, Chelsea Investment Southern California Housing Collaborative, Southern California Housing Collaborative and Chelsea Investment |
| 3:2018cv02371 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Michael S Berg |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg for all further proceedings. The new case number is 18cv2371-AJB-MSB. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 11/7/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Rodriguez. (lrc) (jao). |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Michael Rodriguez. (lrc) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chelsea Investment Southern California Housing Collaborative, Emerson Construction, IFP Filed, filed by Michael Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2371-AJB-AGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(lrc) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
