Richner v. Senomyx, Inc. et al
Alfred Richner |
Dan Stebbins, Senomyx, Inc., Kent Snyder, John W. Poyhonen, Stephen A. Block, Tom Erdmann, Christopher Twomey and Mary Ann Gray |
3:2018cv02383 |
October 18, 2018 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cynthia Bashant |
Mitchell D Dembin |
William V Gallo |
M James Lorenz |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Alfred Richner (Elkins, Joel) (acc). |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Alfred Richner of case(s) 18-cv-02336 re #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Issued . (Elkins, Joel) (QC mailer sent re: signature)(Low-number Order prepared) (sjt). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrm) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Stephen A. Block, Tom Erdmann, Mary Ann Gray, John W. Poyhonen, Senomyx, Inc., Kent Snyder, Dan Stebbins, Christopher Twomey ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11802437.), filed by Alfred Richner. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02383-L-MDD. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Elkins, Joel)(jrm) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.