Ayala v. Romero et al
| Angel P. Ayala |
| Mr. Taylor and L. Romero |
| 3:2018cv02463 |
| October 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Angel P. Ayala. (jms) |
Filing 3
ORDER Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) and Dismissing Civil Action Without for Failing to Prepay Filing Fees Required by Y 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) [ECF. No. #2 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 11/7/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) (sjt). (IFP form mailed to plaintiff on 11/7/2018)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Angel P. Ayala. (jms) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against L. Romero, Taylor, filed by Angel P. Ayala.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2463-CAB-RBM. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
