Herrera-Ochoa v. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III et al
| Jairon Orlando Herrera-Ochoa |
| David Harlow, Steven C Stafford, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and John Kelly |
| 3:2018cv02484 |
| October 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM Denied as Moot, as to Jairon Orlando Herrera-Ochoa. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 11/6/2018.(sjm)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jairon Orlando Herrera-Ochoa (Johnson, James) (sjm). |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Jairon Orlando Herrera-Ochoa. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(mme) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against David Harlow, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, John Kelly, Steven C Stafford, Fee Waived, filed by Jairon Orlando Herrera-Ochoa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application for Writ of Habeaus Corpus Ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02484-BTM. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz is assigned to the case. (Johnson, James)(mme) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
