Canizalez v. Nutrakey, LLC
| Adrian Canizalez |
| Nutrakey, LLC |
| 3:2018cv02645 |
| November 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Michael S Berg |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adrian Canizalez. Nutrakey, LLC served. (Blatt, Gayle) (acc). |
Filing 10
ORDER Granting #9 Joint Motion to Extend Nutrakey, LLC's Time to Respond to Complaint. The Court hereby GRANTS the motion. Accordingly, Defendant has until 1/31/2019 to file an answer or otherwise contact the Court's law clerk to calendar a hearing date for a 12(b)(6) motion. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/2/2019. (acc)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint by Nutrakey, LLC. (Stockinger, Trevor)Attorney Trevor V. Stockinger added to party Nutrakey, LLC(pty:dft) (acc). |
| Filing 8 PRO HAC APPROVED: Charles J. LaDuca appearing for Plaintiff Adrian Canizalez (no document attached) (jrd) |
| Filing 7 PRO HAC APPROVED: Beatrice Oluwayemisi Yakubu appearing for Plaintiff Adrian Canizalez (no document attached) (jrd) |
| Filing 6 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12025615.)(Application to be reviewed by Clerk.)(LaDuca, Charles)(jrd) |
| Filing 5 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12025586.)(Application to be reviewed by Clerk.)(Yakubu, Beatrice)(jrd) |
| Filing 4 PRO HAC APPROVED re #3 : Charles E. Schaffer appearing for Plaintiff Adrian Canizalez. (no document attached) (mdc) |
| Filing 3 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-11982629.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Schaffer, Charles) (mdc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cdw) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Nutrakey, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11918358), filed by Adrian Canizalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02645-AJB-MSB. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Blatt, Gayle)(cdw) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Canizalez v. Nutrakey, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nutrakey, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Trevor V. Stockinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adrian Canizalez | |
| Represented By: | Gayle M Blatt |
| Represented By: | Beatrice Oluwayemisi Yakubu |
| Represented By: | Charles E. Schaffer |
| Represented By: | Charles J. LaDuca |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
