Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 3:2019cv00074
Filed: January 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: Ruben B Brooks
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 0101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #4 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference. Plaintiff may serve a subpoena pursuant to FRCP 45 on Spectrum, seeking only the name and address of the subscriber assigned the IP address 66.75.47.164. Strike 3 Holdings may not subpoena additional information about subscriber. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 3/7/2019. (jah)
February 14, 2019 Filing 6 DECLARATION of Emilie Kennedy by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re #4 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference. (Bandlow, Lincoln). Modified on 2/15/2019 - Wrong event. Linked to wrong document. QC Email sent. Corrected entry (jah).
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER re #4 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. Plaintiff shall supplement its ex parte application by 2/14/2019, by providing evidence that Plaintiff's geolocation services vendor determined that IP address 66.75.47.164 was located in the Southern District of California and of dates on which the geolocation occurred. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 2/7/2019. (jah)
January 30, 2019 Filing 4 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Exhibit A-D - Declarations In Support)(Bandlow, Lincoln). Modified on 1/31/2019 - Corrected motion event and edited text (jah).
January 11, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (lrc) (jao).
January 10, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. Identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (lrc) (jao).
January 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against John Doe ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12079394.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Copyright Report) [Copyright Report Mailed]The new case number is 3:19-cv-74-BAS-RBB. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (Bandlow, Lincoln)(lrc) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Lincoln Dee Bandlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?