Zadina v. City of San Diego et al
| Brent Zadina |
| Anthony Bueno, Does 1-50 and City of San Diego |
| 3:2019cv00442 |
| March 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 5/15/2019 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 3/29/2019. (jah)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Anthony Bueno, City of San Diego. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Abad, Dave)Attorney Dave Esteves Abad added to party Anthony Bueno(pty:dft), Attorney Dave Esteves Abad added to party City of San Diego(pty:dft) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (tcf) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Anthony Bueno, City of San Diego, Does 1-50 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12271495.), filed by Brent Zadina. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-442-BAS-NLS. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case. (Robertson, Thomas)(tcf) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
