Spikes v. San Diego Investments LLC et al
| Karel Spikes |
| Does 1 Through 10, 501 MEDS and San Diego Investments LLC |
| 3:2019cv00634 |
| April 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Marilyn L Huff |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to San Diego Investments LLC. (jah) |
| Filing 4 Request for Entry of Clerk Default against San Diego Investments LLC. (Bentley, Geoffrey). Modified on 7/10/2019 - No affidavit or declaration re service submitted (jah). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Karel Spikes. San Diego Investments LLC served. (Bentley, Geoffrey). (jah). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cdw) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against 501 MEDS, Does 1 Through 10, San Diego Investments LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12370074), filed by Karel Spikes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00634-H-MSB. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Bentley, Geoffrey)(cdw) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
