Vazquez-Vargas v. Barr et al
| Norberto Rafael Vazquez-Vargas |
| David Harlow, Steven C. Stafford, William Pelham Barr and John Kelly |
| 3:2019cv00681 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Vacated Hearing(s): Based on Govt's Voluntary Dismissal, Status Hearing set for 4/15/2019 is vacated (no document attached) (acr) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Hearing: Status Hearing as to Norberto Raphael Vazquez-Vargas (Rule 5) set for 4/15/2019 03:30 PM before Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns (no document attached) (acr) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Norberto Rafael Vazquez-Vargas (Gonzales, Leah) (jdt). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Norberto Rafael Vazquez-Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(jrm) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum against William Pelham Barr, David Harlow, John Kelly, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by Norberto Rafael Vazquez-Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-681-LAB. Judge Larry Alan Burns is assigned to the case. (Gonzales, Leah)(jrm) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
