McEachern v. Koenig et al
| Kevin McEachern |
| William Barr and C. Koenig |
| 3:2019cv00685 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Northern District of California. Case number in other court is 3:19-cv-02399 (jpp) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Northern District of California. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Northern District of California*.*450 Golden Gate Ave Fl 16**San Francisco, 94102*. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(CA Atty General Served)(anh) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin McEachern. (jms) (jao). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against William Barr, C. Koenig, filed by Kevin McEachern.($5 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-685-CAB-MDD. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
