Gutierrez-Chic v. Barr et al
Petitioner: Felipe Gutierrez-Chic
Respondent: Steven C. Stafford, Donald Washington, William P. Barr and David L. Young
Case Number: 3:2019cv00814
Filed: May 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Ruben B Brooks
Referring Judge: John A Houston
2 Judge: Janis L Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER of USCA as to #10 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Felipe Gutierrez-Chic. We have reviewed appellant's emergency motion, which requests that the USCA "clarify that the government may not act on [the] lower court's order of removal until this Court concludes its review in these habeas proceedings." The emergency motion is denied. By this order, we express no opinion as to whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 23(a) applies to the USDC's removal order, which was entered in a USDC case not challenged on appeal. To the extent appellees request dismissal of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, that request is denied without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the answering brief. The motion to expedite is denied. The opening brief has been filed. The briefing schedule previously established remains in effect. (akr)
May 31, 2019 Filing 12 USCA Time Schedule Order as to #10 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Felipe Gutierrez-Chic. (akr)
May 31, 2019 Filing 11 USCA Case Number 19-55625 for #10 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Felipe Gutierrez-Chic. (akr)
May 30, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit as to #8 Order, #9 Clerk's Judgment by Felipe Gutierrez-Chic. Fee Waived. (Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals.) (McGuire, Sean). (akr).
May 24, 2019 Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. (jpp)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 5/24/2019.(jpp) (sjt).
May 21, 2019 Filing 7 TRAVERSE by Felipe Gutierrez-Chic, re #6 Response to Habeas Petition filed by Felipe Gutierrez-Chic. (McGuire, Sean) (jms).
May 16, 2019 Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by William P. Barr.(Ko, Derek)Attorney Derek Timothy Ko added to party William P. Barr(pty:res) (jms).
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER requiring response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Response to Petition due 5/16/2019. Reply by Petitioner due 5/21/2019. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 5/09/2019.(jpp)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Minute Entry as ordered by Judge Janis L. Sammartino: Case related to 19cr7050-JAH. Judge Janis L. Sammartino is no longer assigned to case and Judge John A. Houston is now assigned for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19cv0814-JAH(RBB)(no document attached) (acr)
May 7, 2019 Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENT by Felipe Gutierrez-Chic re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit D, #2 Exhibit E)(McGuire, Sean) (jms).
May 3, 2019 Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Janis L. Sammartino for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19-cv-0814-JLS-RBB.(no document attached) (anh)
May 2, 2019 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against William P. Barr, Steven C. Stafford, Donald Washington, David L. Young,, filed by Felipe Gutierrez-Chic.No Fee Required. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memo of Points and Authorities, #3 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:19-cv-814-BEN-RBB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (McGuire, Sean)(jms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gutierrez-Chic v. Barr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven C. Stafford
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Donald Washington
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William P. Barr
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Derek Timothy Ko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David L. Young
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Felipe Gutierrez-Chic
Represented By: Sean McGuire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?