Renteria v. San Diego Police Department et al

Plaintiff: Jeffrey Ryan Renteria
Defendant: Does 1-25 and San Diego Police Department
Case Number: 3:2019cv00952
Filed: May 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: Jill L Burkhardt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983pr
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2019 Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of San Diego Police Department against Jeffrey Ryan Renteria. Court grants Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a). Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). Court finds that Younger abstention applies, Court denies leave to amend as futile. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) sjt).
June 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Watch Commander of the San Diego Central Jail (SDCJ), or his designee, is directed to collect from prison trust account the $26.50 initial partial filing fee assessed by the Order, and to garnish the remainder of the $350 filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). Because Court finds that Younger abstention applies, Court denies leave to amend. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 6/11/2019. (cc: Watch Commander, San Diego Central Jail) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
May 22, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffrey Ryan Renteria. (jms) (jao).
May 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1-25, San Diego Police Department, filed by Jeffrey Ryan Renteria.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-952-BAS-JLB. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Renteria v. San Diego Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Diego Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Ryan Renteria
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?