Tijerina v. Caliber Holdings Corporation et al
| Kalin Tijerina |
| Caliber Holdings Corporation and DOES 1-50 |
| 3:2019cv01213 |
| June 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William V Gallo |
| John A Houston |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 lr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER on Joint Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. (ECF No. #8 ) Given that Defendant Caliber Holdings Corporation's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss the Case (Doc. No. #7 ) remains pending, the Court hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion to the extent that it VACATES the pre-ENE telephonic conference previously set for September 6, 2019 and the ENE/CMC set for September 11, 2019. The Court ORDERS the Parties to contact Chambers within two business days of District Judge John A. Houston's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration to coordinate further proceedings in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 8/16/2019. (tcf)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference by Caliber Holdings Corporation. (Claxton, Danielle) (tcf). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss the Case by Caliber Holdings Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Robyn Baccus, #3 Declaration of Danielle R. Goodman)(Claxton, Danielle) (tcf). |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. The Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference will be held on September 11, 2019, at 2:00 P.M., before Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo. The telephonic Status Conference is set for September 6, 2019 at 8:00 AM before Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo. A joint discovery plan shall be lodged with Magistrate Judge Gallo on or before August 28, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on July 2, 2019. (tcf) (jao).
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Caliber Holdings Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal,, #2 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), #4 Notice of Related Case, #3 Notice of Party With Financial Interest, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Claxton, Danielle) (tcf). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Caliber Holdings Corporation. No related ases listed. (als) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Caliber Holdings Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal. Identifying Corporate Parent CH Hold Corp., Other Affiliate Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Other Affiliate Robinson Bradford LLP for Caliber Holdings Corporation. (als) (jao). |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Caliber Holdings Corporation. (als) (jao). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California San Diego County- Unlimited Civil, case number 37-2019-00022744-CU-OE-NC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12670074.), filed by Caliber Holdings Corporation, DOES 1-50. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-11, #3 Declaration of Danielle R. Goodman, #4 Declaration of Robyn Baccus)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01213-JAH-WVG. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(als) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
