Lacey-Salas v. Aldi Inc. et al
Jennifer Lacey-Salas |
Aldi Inc., AI California LLC and DOES 1 through 50 |
3:2019cv01269 |
July 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Michael M Anello |
Mitchell D Dembin |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Transfer Letter Received from Central District of California. Case number in other court is 2:19-cv-06741 (mme) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting #11 Joint Motion to Transfer Venue. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the requirements of the first-to-file rule are satisfied and the Court, in its discretion, finds that transferring the instant action to the Central District of California will preserve judicial resources. Accordingly, the Court grants the joint motion and transfers this action to the Central District of California. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate all pending motions, deadlines, and hearings and close the case. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/2/2019. (rmc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/2/2019: #1 Cover Letter to Receiving District; NEF regenerated) (rmc). (jao). |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Change Venue by AI California LLC, Aldi Inc.. (Winters, Mason) (rmc). |
Filing 10 MOTION to Change Venue by AI California LLC, Aldi Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Request for Judicial Notice)(Winters, Mason) (rmc). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance of Mason R. Winters on Behalf of Defendants by Mason R. Winters on behalf of AI California LLC, Aldi Inc. (Winters, Mason)Attorney Mason R. Winters added to party AI California LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Mason R. Winters added to party Aldi Inc.(pty:dft) (rmc). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Compliance With 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) by Aldi Inc. (Li, Leo) (rmc). |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Aldi Inc. of case(s) 2:19-cv-03109-JAK-PLA . (Li, Leo) Proposed LNO not prepared by Clerk's Office as related case not in this District (rmc). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Charlotte Elise James on behalf of Jennifer Lacey-Salas (James, Charlotte)Attorney Charlotte Elise James added to party Jennifer Lacey-Salas (pty:pla) (rmc). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Scott Herman on behalf of Jennifer Lacey-Salas (Herman, Jeffrey)Attorney Jeffrey Scott Herman added to party Jennifer Lacey-Salas (pty:pla) (rmc). |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AI California LLC, Aldi Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (als) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by AI California LLC, Aldi Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal. No Additional Parties With Financial Interest. (als) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by AI California LLC, Aldi Inc.. (als) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Diego, case number 37-2019-00029288-CU-OE-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12706271.), filed by Aldi Inc., DOES 1 through 50, AI California LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A (Service Packet on Al California), #3 Exhibit B (Service Packer on ALDI Inc.), #4 Declaration of Paul Piorkowski In Support of Notice of Removal, #5 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01269-MMA-MDD. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.(als) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.