Chatman v. Wells Fargo et al
Plaintiff: Eric Chatman
Defendant: State Lottery, Wells Fargo and Navy Federal Credit Union
Case Number: 3:2019cv01317
Filed: July 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Anthony J Battaglia
Referring Judge: Bernard G Skomal
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983pr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2019 Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court:1) DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) as barred by 28U.S.C. 1915(g);2) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice for failure to pay the fullstatutory and administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a);3) CERTIFIES that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous andtherefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); and4) DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close the file. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) (sjt).
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis as Barred by 28 USC 1915(g). The Court:1) DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) as barred by 28U.S.C. 1915(g);2) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice for failure to pay the fullstatutory and administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a);3) CERTIFIES that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous andtherefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); and4) DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close the file. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 7/29/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
July 15, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Chatman. (jms) (dsn)
July 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Navy Federal Credit Union, State Lottery, Wells Fargo, filed by Eric Chatman.($400 Filing, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-1317-AJB-BGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (dsn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chatman v. Wells Fargo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Lottery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Chatman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?