Allstate Insurance Company v. DOE 1 et al
| Allstate Insurance Company |
| DOE 1, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, DOE 3 and DOE 2 |
| 3:2019cv01402 |
| July 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jeffrey T Miller |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 in |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmo) (jao). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Allstate Insurance Company. Identifying Corporate Parent The Allstate Corporation for Allstate Insurance Company. (jmo)(jao). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Allstate Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Allstate Corporation for Allstate Insurance Company. (jmo) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, DOE 1, DOE 2, DOE 3 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12764995), filed by Allstate Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Superior Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01402-JM-AGS. Judge Jeffrey T. Miller and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Barnes, Michael)(jmo) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
