Raymond v. FCA US, LLC et al
Jesse Raymond |
DOES 1 through 100 and FCA US, LLC |
3:2019cv01762 |
September 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
William V Gallo |
Thomas J Whelan |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #3 ). The Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's third cause of action. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 11/5/2019. (jdt) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(6) by FCA US, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Notice)(Gregg, Michael) (jao). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by FCA US, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal. Identifying Other Affiliate Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, N.V., Other Affiliate FCA North American Holdings, LLC for FCA US, LLC. (sxa) (jao) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California County of San Diego, case number 37-2019-00042643-CU-BC-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12940283.), filed by FCA US, LLC, DOES 1 through 100. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01762-W-WVG. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(sxa) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.