Haywood v. San Diego, CA Sheriff et al
Petitioner: Erica D. Haywood
Respondent: Xavier Beccera and San Diego, CA Sheriff
Case Number: 3:2019cv01784
Filed: September 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael M Anello
Referring Judge: Ruben B Brooks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/10/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc). (Modified on 10/10/2019: USCA Case Number 19-56185. Order electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals via regenerated NEF.) (akr).
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Denying #7 Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration. Having reviewed its previous ruling, the Court is satisfied that it committed no error. Petitioner has not carried her burden under Rule 59(e) to demonstrate otherwise. Accordingly, the Court denies Petitioner's motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/10/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
October 9, 2019 Filing 9 USCA Case Number 19-56185 for #8 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Erica D. Haywood. (akr)
October 8, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit by Erica D. Haywood. Fee not paid. (The pleading includes a "Motion for Reconsideration" which is docketed at #7 Motion for Reconsideration. Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals.) (akr)
October 8, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration by Erica D. Haywood. (The pleading includes a "Notice of Appeal" which is docketed at #8 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit.) (akr)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Michael M. Anello Rejecting Document: Letter, from Petitioner Erica D. Haywood. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ.L.Rule 83.9: Parties to an action must refrain from writing ex parte letters to the judge. Case closed. Order addressing petition issued on September 24, 2019. See Doc. No. #3 . Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/2/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2019: #1 Rejected Document) (rmc).
September 25, 2019 Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Docket Sheet. Mail sent to Erica D. Haywood. (jms)
September 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Michael M. Anello Rejecting Document: Letter, from Petitioner Erica D. Haywood. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case closed; Civ.L.Rule 83.9: Parties to an action must refrain from writing ex parte letters to the judge. On September 24, 2019, the Clerk of Court was instructed to mail Petitioner a blank civil rights complaint form pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/25/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2019: #1 Rejected Document) (rmc).
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (1) Denying #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; and (2) Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. The Court denies Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismisses this action without prejudice. If Petitioner wishes to pursue her claims regarding the conditions of her confinement, she must file a new civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 which will be given a new case number. The Clerk of Court shall mail Petitioner a blank civil rights complaint form pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 together with a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/24/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Blank 1983 Complaint mailed)(rmc) (sjt).
September 16, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Erica D. Haywood. (jms) (jao).
September 16, 2019 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Xavier Beccera, San Diego, CA Sheriff, filed by Erica D. Haywood.($5 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-1784-MMA-RBB. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case.(jms) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haywood v. San Diego, CA Sheriff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Erica D. Haywood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Xavier Beccera
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: San Diego, CA Sheriff
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?