Ewing v. Leadstak, LLC et al
| Anton Ewing |
| George Hernandez and Leadstak, LLC |
| 3:2019cv01931 |
| October 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Michael S Berg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anton Ewing. George Hernandez served. (sjm) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anton Ewing. Leadstak, LLC served. (jah) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anton Ewing. George Hernandez served. (jah) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anton Ewing. Leadstak, LLC served. (jah) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jxv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against George Hernandez, Leadstak, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CAS115868.), filed by Anton Ewing. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01931-BAS-MSB. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Ewing, Anton)(jxv) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/4/2019) (jxv). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/4/2019: #2 Exhibit A-D) (jxv). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
