Holestine v. Covello et al
| Ernest Kelly Holestine |
| C. Taylor, Lt. Smith, ., F. Armenta, N. Uhde, C/O Salas, P. Bracamonte, C. Covel, D. Paramo, P. Covello, F. Camacho, M. Gonzalez, R. Herrera and A. Gonzalez |
| 3:2020cv00159 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Michael M. Anello is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv159-LAB-JLB.(no document attached) (smd)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ernest Kelly Holestine. (jms)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against P. Covello, D. Paramo, F. Armenta, C. Covel, P. Bracamonte, Smith, A. Gonzalez, R. Herrera, C. Taylor, F. Camacho, N. Uhde, Salas, M. Gonzalez, filed by Ernest Kelly Holestine. ($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-159-MMA-JLB. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
