Rafanan v. Barr et al
John Zeus Rafanan |
David Harlow, Steven C. Stafford, William Pelham Barr and John Kelly |
3:2020cv00485 |
March 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Larry Alan Burns |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas W. Pilchak on behalf of William Pelham Barr (Pilchak, Nicholas)Attorney Nicholas W. Pilchak added to party William Pelham Barr(pty:res). Modified on 3/30/2020 to add Attorney Nicholas W. Pilchak to party David Harlow (pty:res), party John Kelly (pty:res), party Steven C. Stafford (pty:res) (jdt). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by John Zeus Rafanan (Estes, Chelsea) (jdt). |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by John Zeus Rafanan. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(smd) (sjt). |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against William Pelham Barr, David Harlow, John Kelly, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by John Zeus Rafanan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Presequendum)The new case number is 3:20-cv-485-LAB. Judge Larry Alan Burns is assigned to the case. (Estes, Chelsea)(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.