Baesel v. Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc.
| David Baesel |
| Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00886 |
| May 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Shing Tse, re #9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/16/2020.(rmc)
|
| Filing 9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-14013386.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Tse, Shing) (rmc). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Petrina A. McDaniel, re #7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/11/2020.(rmc)
|
| Filing 7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13997766.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (McDaniel, Petrina) (rmc). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Joint Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. This Motion is GRANTED, and Defendant Mutual of Omaha Mortgage, Inc. shall file its answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint through and including July 10, 2020. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/10/2020. (aef)
|
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc.. (Troutman, Eric)Attorney Eric J Troutman added to party Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc. (pty:dft) (aef). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Kaufman on behalf of David Baesel (Kaufman, Rachel)Attorney Rachel Kaufman added to party David Baesel(pty:pla) (aef). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Baesel. Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc. served. (Kaufman, Rachel) (aef). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jxv)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc. (Filing fee $400.00 receipt number ACASDC-13860827.), filed by David Baesel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-886-DMS-AGS. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Benedict, Amanda)(jxv)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baesel v. Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Baesel | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Fay Benedict |
| Represented By: | Rachel Kaufman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Eric J Troutman |
| Represented By: | Petrina McDaniel |
| Represented By: | Shing Tse |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
