Steeves v. Internal Revenue Service
Dean Allen Steeves |
Internal Revenue Service |
3:2020cv00978 |
May 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Larry Alan Burns |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7609 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Amended MOTION to Quash by Dean Allen Steeves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proof of Service)(Kirby, John) (jdt). |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/13/2020: Plaintiff's request for extension of time to file revised motion to quash is granted. The new due date is 7/23/2020. (no document attached) (srm) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE re #8 Order Of Court filed by Dean Allen Steeves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proof of Service)(Kirby, John) (jdt). |
Filing 8 ORDER Accepting Substitution of Counsel; and Instructions to Plaintiff's Counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/1/2020. (jdt) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John David Kirby on behalf of Dean Allen Steeves (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Kirby, John)Attorney John David Kirby added to party Dean Allen Steeves(pty:pla) (jdt). |
Filing 6 ORDER Denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration; and ORDER Requiring Substitution of Counsel. The Court sua sponte extends the deadline for Plaintiff's attorney to substitute in until 6/22/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/16/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration: RESPONSE to #3 Court's Order for Substitution of Counsel, filed by Dean Allen Steeves. (jdt). Modified on 6/17/2020 to change event to Motion for Reconsideration. Edited docket text (jdt). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dean Allen Steeves. Internal Revenue Service served. (jdt) |
Filing 3 ORDER Requiring Substitution of Counsel. Steeves is ordered to retain counsel immediately, who must be a licensed attorney admitted to appear before this Court. His new attorney must substitute in as counsel no later than 6/15/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/2/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (jdt) (sjt). |
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash IRS Summons by Dean Allen Steeves. (no document attached) (smd)(sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Steeves v. Internal Revenue Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dean Allen Steeves | |
Represented By: | John David Kirby |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.