Steeves v. Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: Dean Allen Steeves
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 3:2020cv00978
Filed: May 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Larry Alan Burns
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2020 Filing 11 Amended MOTION to Quash by Dean Allen Steeves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proof of Service)(Kirby, John) (jdt).
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/13/2020: Plaintiff's request for extension of time to file revised motion to quash is granted. The new due date is 7/23/2020. (no document attached) (srm)
July 9, 2020 Filing 9 RESPONSE re #8 Order Of Court filed by Dean Allen Steeves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proof of Service)(Kirby, John) (jdt).
July 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Accepting Substitution of Counsel; and Instructions to Plaintiff's Counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/1/2020. (jdt)
June 22, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John David Kirby on behalf of Dean Allen Steeves (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Kirby, John)Attorney John David Kirby added to party Dean Allen Steeves(pty:pla) (jdt).
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration; and ORDER Requiring Substitution of Counsel. The Court sua sponte extends the deadline for Plaintiff's attorney to substitute in until 6/22/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/16/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)
June 15, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration: RESPONSE to #3 Court's Order for Substitution of Counsel, filed by Dean Allen Steeves. (jdt). Modified on 6/17/2020 to change event to Motion for Reconsideration. Edited docket text (jdt).
June 5, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dean Allen Steeves. Internal Revenue Service served. (jdt)
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Requiring Substitution of Counsel. Steeves is ordered to retain counsel immediately, who must be a licensed attorney admitted to appear before this Court. His new attorney must substitute in as counsel no later than 6/15/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/2/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)
June 2, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (jdt) (sjt).
May 26, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION to Quash IRS Summons by Dean Allen Steeves. (no document attached) (smd)(sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steeves v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dean Allen Steeves
Represented By: John David Kirby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?