Rodriguez v. Barr et al
| Cynthia Rodriguez |
| David Harlow, Steven C. Stafford, William Pelham Barr and John Kelly |
| 3:2020cv01184 |
| June 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Minute Order. for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin:Writ Hearing held on 6/26/2020. Writ denied; Defendant medically unavailable and has been ordered to appear before duty magistrate judge on 6/29/2020 at 2:00 PM. (CD# 6/26/2020 MDD 408-415). (Plaintiff Attorney Mehrdad Barikbin/Christopher Alexander, AUSA).(Defendant Attorney Lauren Williams FD s/a). (no document attached) (dls) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Cynthia Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(mme) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against William Pelham Barr, David Harlow, John Kelly, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by Cynthia Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1184-LAB. Judge Larry Alan Burns is assigned to the case. (Staley-Ngomo, Armilla)(mme) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
