Roberts v. Barr et al
Nicole Alicia Roberts |
David Harlow, John Kellly, Steven C. Stafford and William Pelham Barr |
3:2020cv01275 |
July 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Larry Alan Burns |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nicole Alicia Roberts (Martin, Joanna) (mme). |
Filing 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez: Status Hearing re writ in 20mj2690-LL held on 7/8/2020. The court denies the request for a writ. (CD# 7/8/2020 LL20-3:53-3:54). (Plaintiff Attorney Loren Rene, AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Elizabeth Barros, FD). (no document attached) (rla) |
Filing 3 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Nicole Alicia Roberts (Martin, Joanna) (jdt). |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Nicole Alicia Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Application)(jmr) (jms). |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against William Pelham Barr, David Harlow, John Kellly, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by Nicole Alicia Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1275-LAB. Judge Larry Alan Burns is assigned to the case. (Martin, Joanna)(jmr) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.