Alarcon v. Barr et al
Charollette Yvonne Alarcon |
David Harlow, Steven C. Stafford, William Pelham Barr and John Kelly |
3:2020cv01276 |
July 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Larry Alan Burns |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Charollette Yvonne Alarcon (Martin, Joanna) (jdt). |
Filing 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez: Status Hearing re writ re: 20mj2695-LL held on 7/8/2020. Defense counsel's request for a writ - denied. (CD# 7/8/2020 LL20-3:54-3:55). (Plaintiff Attorney Loren Rene, AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Elizabeth Barros, FD). (no document attached) (rla) |
Filing 3 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Charollette Yvonne Alarcon (Martin, Joanna) (jdt). |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Charollette Yvonne Alarcon. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(dsn) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum against William Pelham Barr, David Harlow, John Kelly, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by Charollette Yvonne Alarcon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1276-LAB. Judge Larry Alan Burns is assigned to the case. (Martin, Joanna)(dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.